New Theory For Cancer Immunotherapy

image

New theory backed by three published studies may lead to less toxic, more effective drug than current therapy.

nsamaranayake@ihv.umaryland.edu (Nora Samaranayake) | Mon Dec 30, 2019

New Theory For Cancer Immunotherapy

December 30, 2019   |  

Scientists from the Institute of Human Virology (IHV) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM) this week proposed a new theory, based on the findings of three previously published studies, to improve the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy drugs. The theory calls for a new design for these drugs that would prevent side effects like life-threatening immune system reactions and enable a higher dose of the drug to be administered.

Many immunotherapy treatments approved to treat cancer are “checkpoint blockade” immunotherapy (CBI) drugs and are designed to block a “checkpoint” molecule that rests on the surface of certain immune cells. Such a block is needed to help the body’s immune cells recognize and attack tumor cells as foreign.

Yang Liu, MD, and Pan Zheng, MD, PhD

Yang Liu, MD, and Pan Zheng, MD, PhD

In healthy tissues, however, checkpoints normally keep the immune system from attacking healthy cells as foreign invaders, so blocking them can trigger severe autoimmune reactions in a patient where the body attacks its own healthy tissues and cells. To prevent these dangerous autoimmune reactions, physicians typically need to limit the doses administered to a patient which, in turn, limits the effectiveness of these drugs.

In a new opinion piece published in Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Yang Liu, MD, professor of surgery and director, Division of Immunotherapy, IHV, and Pan Zheng, MD, PhD, professor of surgery, Division of Immunotherapy, IHV, proposed a new theory that could lead to more effectively designed immunotherapy treatments targeting the CTLA-4 immune checkpoint.

Immunotherapy drugs should no longer be designed to inactivate the CTLA-4 immune checkpoint on the immune T cells that protect against autoimmune diseases. Instead, these drugs should be designed to selectively deplete the regulatory T cells in the tumors while preserving the checkpoints on healthy T cells. This could render the drugs less toxic and enable oncologists to administer the therapy at higher doses.

The researchers base their theory on research they conducted, including a study published in August 2019 in the journal Cell Research. In this study, they and their IHV colleagues tested a new therapy that selectively targets CTLA-4, a checkpoint on T cells, and found that it selectively destroyed the regulatory T cells within the tumor without affecting CTLA-4 function outside the tumors. In a mouse model, it was found to be much less toxic to the animals and even more effective at destroying tumor cells.

“The challenge is to avoid destruction of the targeted molecule, the CTLA-4 protein by the therapeutic drug,” Liu said.

Specifically, the researchers compared antibodies with different toxicities and found that toxic antibodies bind to and drag CTLA-4 molecules to the cell’s lysosomes for destruction. The less-toxic antibodies, on the other hand, separated from these molecules before the cargo containing the drug and its target reached the waste station. This preservation of CTLA-4 has two distinct effects: It protects the host against autoimmune diseases, and it marks the regulatory T cells that suppress the immune system and cause cancer to progress for more efficient elimination by the CTLA-4 targeting drugs.

In addition, the new therapeutic antibodies can be recycled after entering the cells and thus result in higher local drug concentration in the tumors.

“This initial research holds promise for safer and more effective cancer therapies for patients, and we are waiting for FDA approval for first-in-human trials to test this new concept very soon,” Zheng said.

Two other studies published in 2018 in the journal Cell Research — which recently received the 2018 Sanofi-Cell Research outstanding paper award — also provide evidence to support this new theory. Xuexiang Du, PhD, research associate of surgery; Yan Zhang, PhD, research associate of surgery, Mingyue Liu, PhD, postdoc fellow; and Fei Tang, PhD, research associate of surgery, all from IHV, were co-first authors on these papers.

“This is a very interesting and likely important advance by a very creative group at the Institute of Human Virology,” said Robert Gallo, MD, the Homer & Martha Gudelsky Distinguished Professor in Medicine, co-founder and director of IHV, and co-founder and international scientific advisor of the Global Virus Network (GVN).

This work is supported by NIH grant AI64350 and CA227671, Melanoma Research Alliances (MRATSA 559400) and a grant from OncoImmune, Inc. of which Liu and Zheng are among the co-founders and have equity interests.

“Advancing the field of immunotherapy drugs to treat advanced cancers is one of our most pressing public health needs,” said E. Albert Reece, MD, PhD, MBA, UMSOM dean, John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor, and University of Maryland, Baltimore executive vice president for medical affairs. “I am proud of the research team at the Institute of Human Virology that is working to advance the immunotherapy field and render these drugs less toxic to patients.”

About the Institute of Human Virology (IHV)

Formed in 1996 as a partnership between the state of Maryland, the city of Baltimore, the University System of Maryland, and the University of Maryland Medical System, IHV is an institute of the University of Maryland School of Medicine and is home to some of the most globally recognized and world-renowned experts in all of virology. IHV combines the disciplines of basic research, epidemiology, and clinical research in a concerted effort to speed the discovery of diagnostics and therapeutics for a wide variety of chronic and deadly viral and immune disorders — most notably HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. For more information, go to www.ihv.org and follow us on Twitter @IHVmaryland.